Whether or not I have succeeded in this it is not for me to say;and I do not wish to forestall the judgments of others by speaking myself of my writings;but it will gratify me if they be examined,and,to afford the greater inducement to this I request all who may have any objections to make to them,to take the trouble of forwarding these to my publisher,who will give me notice of them,that I may endeavor to subjoin at the same time my reply;and in this way readers seeing both at once will more easily determine where the truth lies;for I do not engage in any case to make prolix replies,but only with perfect frankness to avow my errors if I am convinced of them,or if I cannot perceive them,simply to state what Ithink is required for defense of the matters I have written,adding thereto no explication of any new matte that it may not be necessary to pass without end from one thing to another.
If some of the matters of which I have spoken in the beginning of the "Dioptrics"and "Meteorics"should offend at first sight,because I call them hypotheses and seem indifferent about giving proof of them,I request a patient and attentive reading of the whole,from which I hope those hesitating will derive satisfaction;for it appears to me that the reasonings are so mutually connected in these treatises,that,as the last are demonstrated by the first which are their causes,the first are in their turn demonstrated by the last which are their effects.Nor must it be imagined that I here commit the fallacy which the logicians call a circle;for since experience renders the majority of these effects most certain,the causes from which I deduce them do not serve so much to establish their reality as to explain their existence;but on the contrary,the reality of the causes is established by the reality of the effects.Nor have I called them hypotheses with any other end in view except that it may be known that I think I am able to deduce them from those first truths which I have already expounded;and yet that I have expressly determined not to do so,to prevent a certain class of minds from thence taking occasion to build some extravagant philosophy upon what they may take to be my principles,and my being blamed for it.I refer to those who imagine that they can master in a day all that another has taken twenty years to think out,as soon as he has spoken two or three words to them on the subject;or who are the more liable to error and the less capable of perceiving truth in very proportion as they are more subtle and lively.As to the opinions which are truly and wholly mine,I offer no apology for them as new,--persuaded as I am that if their reasons be well considered they will be found to be so simple and so conformed,to common sense as to appear less extraordinary and less paradoxical than any others which can be held on the same subjects;nor do I even boast of being the earliest discoverer of any of them,but only of having adopted them,neither because they had nor because they had not been held by others,but solely because reason has convinced me of their truth.