On various occasions, producers 將just改為only groups asked firmer control, but the government had no wish to become 在asked 後麵加上for
involving, at least not until wartime when wheat prices threatened to run wild. 將involving改為involved
Anxious to check inflation and rising life costs, the federal government appointed 將life改為living
a board of grain supervisors to deal with deliveries from the crops of 1917
and 1918. Grain Exchange trading was suspended, and farmers sold at prices
fixed by the board. To handle with the crop of 1919, the government appointed 刪掉with或將handle改為deal
the first Canadian Wheat Board, with total authority to buy, sell, and set prices. 將total改為full/complete/absolute/overall
The grammatical words which play so large a part in English grammar are for the most part sharply and obviously different from the lexical words. A rough
and ready difference which may seem the most obvious is that grammatical __1__ words have "less meaning", but in fact some grammarians have called them __2__ "empty" words as opposed in the "full" words of vocabulary. But this is a rather __3__ misled way of expressing the distinction. Although a word like the is not the name __4__ of something as man is, it is very far away from being meaningless; there is a __5__ sharp difference in meaning between "man is vile" and "the man is vile", yet the is the single vehicle of this difference in meaning. Moreover, grammatical words __6__ differ considerably among themselves as the amount of meaning they have even in __7__ the lexical sense. Another name for the grammatical words has been "little words."